Throughout the Old Testament God repeatedly gives us proof that Jesus is the long awaited Messiah. He gave that proof in many ways, but one of the more frequent ways was to reveal the genealogies that wound their ways unbroken right up to the birth of Christ.
Matthew reviewed the genealogies in his first chapter to help the Jews to whom he was writing to understand that Jesus is who He said He is. Although genealogies might seem too boring to read, a careful study of them is very inspirational. They prove Jesus!
In Chapter 5 of Genesis we have such a genealogy. It shows the bloodline from Adam to Noah. There are all kinds of characters in the list. Their names and their names' meanings are in the picture in the upper left.We know most about Enoch and Methuselah.
We know Enoch because he "...walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him away." (Genesis 5:24). Methuselah we know as the oldest man recorded in the Bible, having lived some 969 years.
The last characters in the list are Lamech (not the violent guy of chapter 4), Noah and his three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth.
They set the stage for the most catastrophic event ever to strike earth, and event that would reveal God's character, His grace and His provision...The Flood.
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
Monday, September 28, 2015
Sunday, September 27, 2015
Saturday, September 26, 2015
A Study in GENESIS Week 4
Reading chapters
4-11 of Genesis is like tracing the downward spiral of all humanity. After
making the wrong choice, Adam and Eve could no longer trust each other. Adam
blamed Eve and Eve blamed the serpent and both were alienated from their
perfection.
Adam and Eve
had been naked and felt fine about it. After they decided to do things their
way instead of God’s way, they experienced shame. They hid their bodies from
each other.
Sin is a
vile thing. It is a stench in God’s nostrils. And because of Adam and Eve’s
sin, we are born as sinners. It is not that we have a tendency to sin, it is that we are filled with the sin nature. Like
God said to Adam and Eve, and later through the apostle Paul, the consequence
of sin is death…an eternal death for which there is no earthly remedy.
Verses 1-2 –
Adam and Eve experienced sexual intimacy for the first time, and Eve gave birth,
first to Cain, then to Abel. Cain farmed and Abel shepherded his flocks.
Verses 3-7 –
From the get-go, mankind has recognized the need to make things right with God.
Cain felt a need to make an offering to God. He presented some of the land’s
produce to Him. Abel also felt the need to make an offering. He presented God
with his flock’s firstborn.
There is
enough symbolism in those two offerings to last a lifetime. God’s refusal of
Cain’s offering demonstrated that not just any offering can atone for sin. Abel’s
offering demonstrated that only the blood of life could atone for sin.
Hebrews 11:4 tells us that God accepted Abel's offering because he offered it by faith: "By faith, Abel offered to God a better sacrifice than Cain. By faith he was approved as a righteous man, because God approved his gifts, and even though he is dead, he still speaks through his faith."
Hebrews 11:4 tells us that God accepted Abel's offering because he offered it by faith: "By faith, Abel offered to God a better sacrifice than Cain. By faith he was approved as a righteous man, because God approved his gifts, and even though he is dead, he still speaks through his faith."
Verses 8-12 –
Cain’s lack of understanding about making up for sin and God’s refusal of his
offering made him angry enough to kill Abel, whose offering God had accepted. When
confronted by God about it, Cain uttered those famous (and often misused)
words, “Am I my brother’s keeper?”
Mankind is
very prone to rationalizing and excusing sinful behavior. “It’s not my job” is a pretty standard response to taking responsibility
for one’s actions.
Verses 13-18
– God’s response to Cain was punishment, but true to His nature, God’s
punishment was much lighter than he deserved. Far from rendering instant death
(eye for eye, tooth for tooth) God showed mercy to Cain. He even protected him.
He even allowed Cain to start a line of descendants.
Verse 19-24 –
A guy named Lamech appears next. Lamech accumulates wives like property. He sings
songs of violence that are about how he is more violent than Cain and proud of
it. This is about the downward spiral of mankind into worldliness.
Verses 25-26
– Adam and Eve then bore Seth. Seth gave birth to Enoch. This would begin the
lineage of Noah and ultimately of Christ whose blood would be the ultimate
remedy for man’s sin.
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Video Explanation of Covenants
There are actually seven covenants in the Bible: The Edenic Covenant; The Adamic Covenant; The Noahic Covenant; The Abrahamic Covenant; The Mosaic Covenant; The Covenant of the Land; The Davidic Covenant and The New Covenant. There are a few other "minor" covenants, such as the covenant of circumcision, but these are the main ones.
In most cases, when theologians speak of the covenants of the Old Testament, they are referring to the four major covenants: The Noahic; Abrahamic; Mosaic and Davidic. There is only one covenant in the New Testament. It is called the New Covenant, prophesied in the Old Testament. The New Covenant fulfills all of the Old Covenant in Jesus, and the Old Covenant is made obselete (Hebrews 8:13).
Here is an illustrative explanation of the four major covenants.
The Bible Project
In most cases, when theologians speak of the covenants of the Old Testament, they are referring to the four major covenants: The Noahic; Abrahamic; Mosaic and Davidic. There is only one covenant in the New Testament. It is called the New Covenant, prophesied in the Old Testament. The New Covenant fulfills all of the Old Covenant in Jesus, and the Old Covenant is made obselete (Hebrews 8:13).
Here is an illustrative explanation of the four major covenants.
The Bible Project
Monday, September 21, 2015
Sunday, September 20, 2015
Saturday, September 19, 2015
A Study in Genesis Chapter 3
Genesis 3 is
an accurate historical record of what happened in the Garden of Eden. If you
don’t understand this chapter, you cannot understand the rest of the Bible. You
must understand sin before you can understand the need to repent of it and
place you faith in the finished work of Christ at the cross of Calvary.
All of the
problems in the universe have their origins in Genesis 3. It is the foundation of a correct world view.
God had proclaimed His creation good. Now it is fallen and exhibits all of the
evils of its fall.
Verse 1-5 –
The Hebrew word for “serpent” is Nachah, to
shine, or a shining one. That is the picture of Satan given us in the story Lucifer’s
fall, described in Isaiah 14:12-14 and Ezekiel 28:12-18. These two passages
reference the spiritual power of Satan. Angels were created before the earth. Satan
fell before he tempted Adam and Eve.
The serpent
misquotes God, saying that God had said Adam and Eve could not eat from any
tree.
Eve corrected that, but went on to
say the God had told them not to touch
the fruit of the tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil. Satan then contradicts
God by saying, “…you shall not surely die.”
Verse 6 –
Eve picked and ate the fruit from the tree because it looked good to her. Sin
often looks good, but its consequences are always dire.
Verse 7-13 –
After failing to trust God’s word, thus making the wrong choice, Adam and Eve can’t even trust each
other anymore. This distrust occurs because Adam’s definition of good and evil
might be different from Eve’s. They had been naked and felt fine about it. Now
they feel shameful. They hide their bodies from each other.
Through this
act of disobedience, sin entered the world. Romans 5:12 “Therefore
just as through one man sin entered into the world and death through sin and so
death spread to all men, because all sinned.” When Adam sinned, we were all
there. He brought to us original sin.
We all have inherited original sin.
When
confronted with their sin, Adam and Eve tried to pass the buck. Adam blamed
Eve. Eve blamed Satan.
Verses 14-19
God placed a curse on Satan. In verse 15, we read of the eventual crushing of
Satan by the heel of the Messiah (Christ) at His death. When Jesus died, Satan
thought it was a victory. Little did he know that it was his ultimate undoing.
Then God
placed a curse on Adam and eve. A curse by God has eternal consequences. There
is only one escape from the curse of
God. It is not in obedience, it is too late for that. The only escape is through placing one’s faith
in, and only in, the finished work of Christ at the cross of Calvary. Once you
have done that, you are free from the curse of sin and death…forever.
As
Christians, we do not have to run around with our “tails between our legs,”
afraid that we might do something that offends God. Anything we do is offensive
to God unless He sees us through Christ’s death, burial and resurrection. But
if He does see us through the eyes
of Christ, we are secure in Him. We are set free! The sin we inherited from
Adam is completely covered by Christ’s shed blood.
We might
well sin, but when we do, if we are saved, it hurts us and we determine by the
power of the Holy Spirit not to repeat the sin. If we are not hurt by our own
sin, we are probably not saved. As Paul said in Romans 6:15, “What then? Shall we sin because we are not
under the law but under grace? By no means!”
Through
Christ, God gives us freedom; not freedom to sin, freedom to live in the power
and presence of the Holy Spirit. Now that’s real freedom.
Aren’t you
glad that Adam’s sin that was passed on to us is made right by the second Adam,
Christ our Savior?
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Wednesday, September 16, 2015
How many different, meaningful sermons could you preach in a year?
There are 1,189 chapters in the bible.
If you preached a sermon built on the meaning of each one
each Sunday, it would be 22 years before you had to repeat a sermon. If you
preach Sunday morning, Sunday evening and Wednesday evening, in seven years you
would never have to repeat a sermon.
Don’t worry! Every topic you can possibly think of would be
covered, because the Bible touches every subject that has ever occurred to man.
So, why do so many preachers preach the same sermons so
often? Are they lazy? Do they think some chapters just don’t have anything
significant to say? Did they just forget that they had preached the same sermon
just a short time ago? Could it be that they just don’t care?
Maybe they think that congregations are so simple minded
that they can only take in sermons about Joshua’s determination, David’s
triumph over Goliath, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego’s facing the fiery furnace
and Lazarus dipping his finger in the water to cool the tongue of Diver (traditional
name).
Perhaps repetitious preachers don’t think their
congregations can remember that they have already preached that same sermon a half-a-dozen
times within the past year or so.
To be sure, there are some chapters that lend themselves to
special events. Christmas, Easter, and maybe Mothers’ Day and Fathers’ Day
might be examples. But allowing for those, it would be even longer before a
particular sermon would have to be repeated.
It could be that some people who think they’ve been called to preach are just the objects of their
own vain imaginations and can’t really preach their way out of a wet paper
sack.
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Monday, September 14, 2015
An Overview of the Stories and Meaning of Genesis
I. I. Genesis
is a book deliberately designed by God in a specific way for a specific reason.
The book is divided into two main parts.
a.
Chapters
1-11 tells the story of God and the entire world.
b.
Chapters
12-50 tells about God and Abraham’s family.
c.
How
the two of those parts relate is where you find the message of the book.
II. II. Part 1
a.
The
creation story which tells about God creating everything.
b.
God
takes the dark watery chaos and turns it into a beautiful garden.
i. In the garden we meet the first human
characters in the Bible, Adam & Eve.
1.
Adam is the Hebrew word for humanity.
2.
Eve is the Hebrew word for life.
3.
They
represent the creative work of God and His desire for mankind to reproduce
itself.
c.
God
gives Adam and Eve the moral choice about how they will build this world.
i. Up to now, God has been defining and
providing what is good.
ii. The tree of the knowledge of good and
evil represents a choice for Adam and Eve.
1.
Will
the humans trust God’s definition of good and evil?
2.
Will
the humans seize the opportunity to define good and evil themselves?
3.
They
choose to eat the fruit, desiring to “call the shots”…pride and selfishness.
iii. Humans turn out to be horrible at
defining good and evil without God.
d.
Genesis
2-11 is like tracing the downward spiral of all humanity.
i. After making the wrong choice, Adam
and Eve can’t trust each other anymore.
1.
They
had been naked and felt fine about it.
2.
Now
they feel shameful.
a.
Adam’s
definition of good and evil might be different from Eve’s.
b.
They
hide their bodies from each other.
ii. In the next story, Cain becomes
jealous of Abel, gives in to temptation and kills him.
iii. A guy named Lamech appears next.
1.
Lamech
accumulates wives like property.
2.
He
sings songs of violence that are about how he is more violent than Cain and proud
of it.
iv. Things get so bad with the human race
that God decides to wipe it out with a flood.
1.
This
is not God’s anger, it is about His
sadness and grief about the state of the world.
2.
The
waters of the flood show that only God can wash things clean.
3.
God
chooses Noah and his family (along with the animals) and saves them on the arc.
a.
Noah
and his family “reboot” all of humanity.
b.
After
the flood had receded, Noah planted a vineyard and gets very drunk.
c.
Something
sketchy happens in his ten with his son.
v. Humanity grows again and things are
as bad as before.
vi. The last story is of the Tower of
Babel.
1.
All
nations unite to use technology (bricks) to build a big city.
2.
They
build a tower, ostensibly to reach to the gods.
3.
God
knows that this city will be a nightmare.
a.
In
His mercy, God scatters the people.
e.
All
of these stories underline the same basic idea.
i. When humans define good and evil
themselves, it results in tragedy and death.
ii. This leaves us wondering: Is there
any hope for humanity?
iii. The very next story will answer that
question.
iv. It is the beginning of God’s mission
to rescue and restore His world.
III. III. Between
part 1 and part 2 of Genesis is a story that links the two parts and helps us
understand what the book is about.
a.
A
genealogy follows one of the scattered tribes of Babel all the way down to one
man: Abram.
IV. IV. Part 2
a.
The
second part of Genesis focusses only on Abraham’s family.
i. God promises Abram an uncountable
number of children.
ii. He says that through Abram and his
family, all the nation of the earth are going to be able to find God’s
blessing.
iii. God will begin to reveal His plan to rescue
humanity.
iv. The generations He will use include: Abraham;
Isaac; Jacob; and Jacob’s 12 sons.
v. To each generation, God renews His
promise to bless them and all nations through them.
vi. Because of His promise to use this
family to rescue the world, it is easy to read these stories as examples of how
to be a good person.
vii. But the family is dysfunctional.
1.
Two
different times Abraham basically gives Sarah away to other men by denying that
she is his wife.
2.
Sarah
gets impatient about having a son, so she makes Abram sleep with her servant
girl.
3.
Abraham
and Sarah get really old and think there is no way they’re going to have a kid
of their own. Miraculously, they have a child in their old age named, Isaac. Isaac
has Esau and Jacob.
4.
Jacob
wants the family’s inheritance and devises a plan to steal it from his father,
who is old and blind.
5.
Jacob
goes on to have twelve sons, but loves his 11th son, Joseph more
than the others.
6.
Joseph’s
brothers hate him and plan to kill him.
a.
Instead
they sell him as a slave down in Egypt.
b.
While
in Egypt, Joseph goes from being in a prison cell to becoming Egypt’s second in
command.
c.
The
Middle East suffers a food shortage, so Joseph’s brother come down looking for
food.
d.
They
find Joseph, now the ruler of the land.
e.
Joseph
gives them food.
7.
God
has transformed the evil of the brothers into something good. That’s the way
God does things.
V. V. Genesis
closes with Joseph’s statement, “You planned all of this for evil, but God has
turned it into something good, to save peoples’ lives.”
a.
These
words summarize the message of the whole story.
i. Humans keep choosing evil.
ii. We think they are messing up God’s
plan, but He keeps turning their evil back into good.
b.
God
is going to use this family to restore humanity back to the garden.
VI. IV. The rest of the bible answers the
question of how God is going to accomplish this. Hint: Follow the next 38 books
all the way to Jesus.
Sunday, September 13, 2015
Saturday, September 12, 2015
A Study in Genesis Week 2
GENESIS CHAPTER 2
- God is called “Yahweh Elohim” (His unmentionable
name followed by His plural name – translated as “Lord God”)
- Stresses the closeness of
man’s relationship with his Creator
- Represents the earliest
“covenant form” in Scripture…the covenant between God the unknowable and
the triune knowable God with mankind.
- You will see the phrase,
“this is the history (Hebrew: toledoth)
of…” used often in Scripture
- This indicates that the
things referred to are in written form.
i. Until
recently it was thought that writing had not been invented at the time of
Moses, but that turns out not to be the case.
ii. Archeologists
have uncovered writing that pre-dates Moses
- It is extremely probable that at some stage these early ‘covenant’ tablets were incorporated into a series of tablets making up Genesis 1 - 11, which almost certainly once formed a unit.
- 2:1 reiterates that
creation had taken place.
- Verse 2 pre-dates the Law
(10 Commandments)
- The rest (Hebrew: Shabath – seventh, complete) of
God
- He was not tired.
- He was finished
- 2:4 sets the stage for the
creation of man
- Verse 7 tells us that man
was made from the dust of the earth
- Job says “dust to dust”
- “Breath of Life”
- Man is not like the other
life-forms on earth.
- Intellectually superior
- Technically superior
- Dextrally superior
- Compassionately superior
- Cognitively superior
- Emotionally superior
- Spiritually superior
- Verses 9-17 - God gave man
a perfect place to live; Eden
- Eden is a picture of
potential perfection
- Man is seen by God as “Edenic”
through the eyes of Christ.
- The redeemed will live in “Eden” once again…Heaven
- Verses 18-23 - God made
Eve (woman) to be a help-meet for Adam
- Not a servant
- Not a slave
- An integral part of the mankind unit
- Verses 24-25 God defines
the terms of marriage
- Forsaking all others,
even other family (mothers and fathers)
- Clinging to one another
- Becoming a total unit
Friday, September 11, 2015
Wednesday, September 09, 2015
Why Not Teach and Preach What Hebrews Really Says?
I love the book of Hebrews. Oh, I love the 4 gospels, Romans, Acts, 1st and 2nd Timothy and all of the other New Testament books, but Hebrews trumps them all in my mind. It does so because from verse one to the end of the book it magnifies, and only magnifies, my Lord and My Savior, Jesus Christ (Messiah). To Bible scholars, Hebrews is known as Christology, and for good reason. Every word of it is about Christ.
I am sad when a part of the book of Hebrews is ripped from its context and used to take a sermon in any direction other than Christ-ward. That's just wrong. It is so very shallow.
The most abused passage in Hebrews is what we piously call the "Hall of Faith," chapter 11. In this abominable misuse of God's word, the book is broken up to make some moralistic, sophomoric, theosophical, ear tickling, pablumesque point about generic faith in a generic god.
To reach this despicable interpretation of Hebrews 11, it must be forcibly wrenched from its context. It must be twisted like a flag in a hurricane. It must be mistreated in the extreme.
To reach this interpretation, one would have to believe that God, the God of all order, was inspiring the writer to lift up Jesus, suddenly change the subject for one chapter and then revert to the subject he started with.
God never inspired His writers to write like that...never.
It is so easy, even lazy, to just pull that chapter out of Hebrews and treat it like it is a book of its own with an interpretation that wallows in curdled spiritual milk. When used like this, its point is to extract some form of behaviorism from those who hear it preached.
If only those who teach and preach chapter 11 of Hebrews would take the time to realize that it is part of a narrative that is designed to prove to the Jewish mind that Jesus is their long awaited Messiah. Indeed, every Jew reading the book of Hebrews would understand immediately what its author was saying: Christ is Messiah, He is greater than Moses, greater than the prophets and greater than the highest earthly priest who ever lived.
The characters listed in Hebrews 11 were not being exalted by its writer as somehow special because of their faith. No! The object of their faith was the one exalted. Their faith was not in faith, not in some poignant, generic god. Their faith was that God would bring forth the Messiah!
If the exultation of Christ is not more exciting in your mind than some esoteric concept of faith floating around somewhere in history, there is something wrong with your salvation and something wrong with your understanding of Scripture.
Go! Read Hebrews from beginning to end and see how the "Hall of Faith" is connected at both ends to the person of Jesus Christ and that He is the source of life and salvation.
I am sad when a part of the book of Hebrews is ripped from its context and used to take a sermon in any direction other than Christ-ward. That's just wrong. It is so very shallow.
The most abused passage in Hebrews is what we piously call the "Hall of Faith," chapter 11. In this abominable misuse of God's word, the book is broken up to make some moralistic, sophomoric, theosophical, ear tickling, pablumesque point about generic faith in a generic god.
To reach this despicable interpretation of Hebrews 11, it must be forcibly wrenched from its context. It must be twisted like a flag in a hurricane. It must be mistreated in the extreme.
To reach this interpretation, one would have to believe that God, the God of all order, was inspiring the writer to lift up Jesus, suddenly change the subject for one chapter and then revert to the subject he started with.
God never inspired His writers to write like that...never.
It is so easy, even lazy, to just pull that chapter out of Hebrews and treat it like it is a book of its own with an interpretation that wallows in curdled spiritual milk. When used like this, its point is to extract some form of behaviorism from those who hear it preached.
If only those who teach and preach chapter 11 of Hebrews would take the time to realize that it is part of a narrative that is designed to prove to the Jewish mind that Jesus is their long awaited Messiah. Indeed, every Jew reading the book of Hebrews would understand immediately what its author was saying: Christ is Messiah, He is greater than Moses, greater than the prophets and greater than the highest earthly priest who ever lived.
The characters listed in Hebrews 11 were not being exalted by its writer as somehow special because of their faith. No! The object of their faith was the one exalted. Their faith was not in faith, not in some poignant, generic god. Their faith was that God would bring forth the Messiah!
If the exultation of Christ is not more exciting in your mind than some esoteric concept of faith floating around somewhere in history, there is something wrong with your salvation and something wrong with your understanding of Scripture.
Go! Read Hebrews from beginning to end and see how the "Hall of Faith" is connected at both ends to the person of Jesus Christ and that He is the source of life and salvation.
Do you care about the TRUTH of Scripture, or do you cling to what you've been taught?
The
problem is, too many people, teachers, leaders, teachers and professors don't
care what the Scriptures really teach. They have been taught a certain way and
that's the way they're going to teach, no matter what.
What if the Scriptures don't teach
what those people have been taught? Would it make any difference? Probably not.
Most people would grit their teeth, lock their jaws and just keep on teaching
what they've always taught.
Let's take a look at one of the most often improperly
taught concepts in the Bible: giving to the church.
I know. It's an emotional topic that will raise the hairs
on the back of the head of many. That's OK. What the Scripture really teaches
about giving for the Christian is what IT really teaches, not what may have
been ingrained into the minds of learned, self-professed "scholars."
Some of that angst you feel might well stem from fear and
(would you believe it?) lack of faith. That's right, I said "lack of
faith." After all, if we don't preach our standard concepts of giving, the
church will suffer financially. That's analogous to politicians who think that
if we don't raise taxes the country's coffers will be empty.
The first thing that has to be settled is whether the Old
Covenant still applies to Christians. Are we to live under the Old Covenant and
just add the New Covenant to it, or did the life, death, burial and
resurrection of Christ usher in a New Covenant? Does it matter?
Writing to the Jews, the author of Hebrews (whom I believe
to be Paul) wrote a huge amount about who Jesus is and how He ushered in a New
Covenant. According to him, the New Covenant is not just an extension of the
Old Covenant, but is a replacement for it. After establishing the unequaled
High Priesthood of Jesus, he then tells us that the Old Covenant is obsolete
(Hebrews 8:13) and has been REPLACED with a new agreement from God to us.
It is a TOTALLY DIFFERENT RELATIONSHIP with God than we previously had, one
built on the Lordship of Christ.
So, if the New Covenant replaced the
Old Covenant then the rules, practices and requirements of the Old Covenant no
longer apply.
With this in mind, let's look at the concept of Christian
giving under the New Covenant.
The same book of Hebrews that we looked at above, in chapter
7:4-6 records that Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils of war back to the Lord.
By his example, the Levite priests were to collect from the Israelites a tithe
or 10% to support their ministry.
I know the arguments over the arguments: “Well tithing is
Old Testament law, and we’re no longer under the Law.” That is true, but it is irrelevant
to the idea of giving. So is the opposite argument that “The Bible teaches it,
so we ought to do it.”
Be very careful with this kind of argument. There are some
things taught in the Bible’s Old Testament that I KNOW you don’t think we are
required to follow. They couldn’t step on grass on the Sabbath. Was it only that part of the Law we get to ignore
under the New Covenant? There are many other more ominous teachings of the Old
Testament that you don’t think we should follow.
So…do we get to pick and choose what part of the Law we
follow and what part we ignore? NO. We MUST understand that the Law was
completely fulfilled in Jesus. As the highest of High Priests, Jesus fulfilled
the Law on our behalf so we don’t have to. Good thing, too. ‘Cause there’s no
way we could fulfill it ourselves.
Even if we tried, our hearts would be our undoing. Under the
Law, our giving was not righteousness. Our righteousness, even our
righteousness in giving, is as filthy rags in God’s eyes.
The New Covenant concept of giving is to give as God leads,
from the heart, willingly and cheerfully. It is also to give 100% of one’s life;
money, time talents, everything.
Do you remember the poor widow who dropped her money into
the coffers? Do you remember how Jesus praised her for giving her 10% to the
Lord? Oh, that’s right. He didn’t. He praised her for giving everything she
had.
Perhaps you recall the rich young Jewish ruler who came to
Jesus to find out how to be saved. He bragged about having kept the Law by
giving his tithe. Jesus told him to sell 10% of everything he had and give it
to the poor…no, wait! He told him to sell everything
he had and give IT to the poor.
WOW! Jesus’ standard is much greater than the Old Testament
standard! He wants much more than 10%. He wants 100% of us…no exceptions.
Well, what about Malachi? Didn’t he say to bring all the
tithes into the storehouse? Didn’t he warn against bringing poor tithes and
offerings?
Yes, he did.
Well, there you go.
No, there you don’t go.
First of all, Malachi recognized the tithe as a tax paid to
the priest. Ever since Abraham gave his tithe to Melchizedek, priests had
demanded a 10% tax from the Jews. Not only that, they had demanded other taxes
(tithes) that we sort of see fit to ignore today.
Secondly, although some try to establish some kind of
analogy between the silos used as storehouses for the priests and the church as
the storehouse today, there is NO Biblical connection drawn between the two.
The church is not a storehouse, it is a “pass through” house. We are not to
store up riches, we are to disseminate riches.
As to the fear of not being able to raise the money needed
to operate a church, exercise a little faith.
God is able to touch the hearts
of people to give generously. Have you ever heard someone say something like, “If
all the people here would just tithe, we would have no trouble meeting our
budget.”
Well, if all the people engaged in New Covenant giving we
would have so much that we’d be looking for new ministries to begin.
Why don’t people give like the New Testament teaches?
Answer: They have never been taught New Testament giving. They have been taught
Old Testament giving with any giving above that as “extra.”
Why would anyone suggest some small percentage when Jesus
endorsed one hundred percent?
“Well I just preach the Bible, and that includes the Old
Testament.” Actually, you don’t. You just read words and philosophize about
them. The Old Testament’s purpose is not to instruct us in how to live. Its
purpose is to point us to Christ. That’s the way it was used every time it was
quoted by a New Testament character; Jesus, Paul, James, Peter, John and
everyone else.
It is a dangerous thing to oppose traditional thinking. The
consequences proffered by those in spiritual power can be disheartening at
best, devastating at worst.
For the sake of the gospel, teachers, leaders, preachers and
professors, learn to read what the Bible actually
teaches. You will not be harmed by it. On the contrary, you will be blessed
beyond your ability to comprehend.
Monday, September 07, 2015
What Is the Lords Supper?
Periodically we partake in the Lord’s
Supper, also called “Communion.” What is it about? Why do we partake of it?
There is an uber literal interpretation
of the Lord’s Supper that teaches that the bread and the wine (or fruit of the
vine, if you prefer) literally become
the body and blood of Christ. That is called Transubstantiation.
Another interpretation holds that the
body and blood of Christ are with or infused into the bread and the wine.
This interpretation is called Consubstantiation.
The last common interpretation is that
the bread and wine represent the body
and blood of Christ. Some who hold this view refer to it as sacramental. Others refer to it as an ordinance.
For the transubstantiationists, the argument surrounds the word is. Jesus said, “This…is my body.” So, if we are to take
Scripture literally, they teach that
the bread becomes the literal body of Christ and the wine becomes the literal
blood of Christ.
However, those who hold to a
sacramental or ordinal viewpoint remind us that in the very next verse, Jesus
says, that He would not drink again from the “fruit of the vine” until the
kingdom. Jesus’ own statement makes it clear that they had just drunk some
wine. They did not drink His blood.
Luke also references the
fruit of the vine in Luke 22:14-20 And when the
hour came, he reclined at table, and the apostles with him. And he said to
them, “I have earnestly desired to eat
this Passover with you before I suffer. For I tell you I will not eat it until
it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.” And he took a cup, and when he had
given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves. For I tell
you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom
of God comes.”
What is more essential than the surface
doctrinal issue is the purpose and meaning of the Lord’s Supper. Here are the
major Bible references to it.
Matthew 26:26-29 Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke
it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take,
eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave
it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the
covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you
I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it
new with you in my Father's kingdom.”
Mark 14:22-25 And as they
were eating, he took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to them,
and said, “Take; this is my body.” And he
took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank
of it. And he said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured
out for many. Truly, I say to you, I will not drink again of the fruit of the
vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.”
1 Corinthians 11:23-29 For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to
you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when
he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This
is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also
he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my
blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as
often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death
until he comes.
There is a common phrase to
each of these passages. It is the phrase, “new covenant.” Matthew calls it Christ’s
blood of the new covenant. Mark also refers
to it as “…my blood of the new covenant. In 1 Corinthians, Paul
records as saying, “…the new covenant
of my blood.”
This is exceedingly
significant. By Jesus’ own testimony, the Lord’s Supper is a representation of
the New Covenant. The New Covenant is the new agreement God has made with man.
It supersedes the Old Covenant. No part of the Old Covenant is in play anymore.
If that is not true, then Jesus’ death was for nothing.
Under the new covenant, Jesus could
remove a person’s sins when
he believes in Him. That is, his sins were remitted, or canceled,
when he repented of sin and placed his faith in, and only in the finished work
of Christ at the cross of Calvary.
The New Covenant is not an extension of the Old Covenant, it replaced the Old Covenant (the Mosaic Covenant or The Law). The Old
Covenant could never remove sins
since the blood of bulls and goats could not take away sin (Hebrews 10:1-18). It was obsolete (Hebrews 8:13). The New Covenant gave life, spiritual
life by a new and better way (Hebrews 10:19-20).
When we celebrate the Lord’s Supper, we
are remembering that Christ has ushered in that New Covenant that provides us
the only way to eternal life, through
the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







